What is the Difference Between Appeal and Review?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between an appeal and a review lies in their focus and purpose. Here are the key distinctions between the two:
- Appeal: An appeal is a request to change or modify a decision or verdict. It focuses on the merits of the decision and often involves a higher court re-examining the case and potentially reversing or modifying the original decision. Appeals can only be filed if there is a statutory right to do so.
- Review: A review is a request to examine the legality of a ruling or decision. It focuses on the process leading to the outcome, rather than the outcome itself. Reviews are usually sought in the same court where the original decision was made and may be undertaken suo moto (on the court's own initiative). Unlike appeals, reviews are a discretionary right of the court.
In summary, an appeal is about re-examining the merits of a decision, while a review is about examining the legality of the ruling or decision.
Comparative Table: Appeal vs Review
The difference between an appeal and a review can be summarized in the following table:
Feature | Appeal | Review |
---|---|---|
Meaning | A request made to a superior court to review the decision given by a subordinate court. | Re-examining and amending a decision with a view to correct it and make it just and fair. |
Purpose | To correct an error in the application of the law or to assess the correctness of the decision made. | To determine whether the lower court's decision was justified based on the evidence presented. |
Frequency | Can be made multiple times. | Can be made only once. |
Substantive Right | Yes, it is a substantive right conferred by the statute. | No, it is the discretionary power of the high court regarding acceptance or rejection of a petition for revision. |
Filing | Made to the superior court, which can be a district court or high court. | Filed to the high court for the decision made by the lower court working under that high court. |
Grounds | Can be made on the grounds of the question of law and fact. | The essential question in review proceedings is not the correctness of the decision under review but whether it is justified based on the evidence presented. |
Evidence | Evidence is placed before the court by its inclusion in the appeal book. | The standard of review applied is generally based on the type of ruling up on appeal and the decision-maker below. |
In summary, an appeal is a request to a superior court to review a decision made by a lower court, while a review is a re-examination of the decision to determine its justification based on the evidence presented.
Read more:
- Appeal vs Revision
- Review vs Audit
- Review vs Revise
- Critique vs Review
- Research Article vs Review Article
- Trial Court vs Appellate Court
- Original Jurisdiction vs Appellate Jurisdiction
- Adjudication vs Conviction
- Court vs Trial
- Judgement vs Verdict
- Arbitration vs Adjudication
- Judge vs Jury
- Court vs Tribunal
- Peer Reviewed vs Refereed Journal
- Audit vs Inspection
- Compare vs Contrast
- Audit vs Evaluation
- Answer vs Reply
- Reproof vs Correction