What is the Difference Between BCA and Bradford Assay?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The BCA (Bicinchoninic Acid) and Bradford assays are both methods used to quantify protein concentration in a sample. They have different principles, advantages, and limitations:
BCA Assay:
- Based on protein-copper chelation and secondary detection of reduced copper.
- Extremely sensitive, up to 100 times more sensitive than the Biuret method.
- Compatible with a wide range of detergents (ionic and non-ionic).
- Demonstrates a more uniform response to different proteins compared to the Bradford assay.
- Requires a prolonged inhibition time, ranging from 30 minutes to 2 hours.
Bradford Assay:
- Based on protein-dye binding, resulting in a color shift from 465 to 595 nm.
- Quick and easy to perform, with the entire process taking about half an hour.
- Compatible with most buffers, solvents, salts, reducing agents, and chelating agents.
- High protein-to-protein variation compared to the BCA assay.
- Incompatible with surfactants and not suitable for proteins with poor acid solubility.
When choosing between the BCA and Bradford assays, consider factors such as protein-to-protein uniformity, sample volume, accuracy, speed, convenience, and the presence of interfering substances. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, so it is essential to select the most compatible method for your specific sample type and experimental conditions.
Comparative Table: BCA vs Bradford Assay
Here is a table comparing the Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) assay and Bradford assay:
Parameter | BCA Assay | Bradford Assay |
---|---|---|
Principle | Colorimetric reaction between BCA and copper ions generated from proteins | Spectroscopic analytical method using Coomassie Blue dye to bind to proteins under acidic conditions |
Sensitivity | High sensitivity | One-step, <10 minute assay |
Detection Range | Wide detection range (20-2000ug/ml) | Not useful for proteins with above or below average amount of basic amino acids |
Effect of Reducing Agents | Reaction affected by reducing agents and chelators (e.g., EDTA) | Reaction is affected by the presence of common protein surfactants (e.g., Triton X, SDS) |
Instrumentation | Does not require expensive machinery | Does not require expensive machinery |
Color Density | Color density affected by the presence of asparagine, tyrosine, cysteine, tryptophan, and histidine | Not useful for proteins with above or below average amount of basic amino acids |
Accuracy | Less accurate | Quick and accurate |
Sample Preparation | Proper sample preparation and accurate standard curves required | Reaction is affected by the presence of common protein surfactants (e.g., Triton X, SDS) |
Both assays are used for protein quantification, but they have different principles, sensitivities, and affects on reducing agents and chelators. The BCA assay is colorimetric and uses copper ions generated from proteins, while the Bradford assay is a spectroscopic method using Coomassie Blue dye to bind to proteins under acidic conditions. The BCA assay is less accurate than the Bradford assay.
- Bradford vs Lowry Protein Assay
- BBA vs BCA
- Bioassay vs Chemical Assay
- Biochemical vs Cell Based Assays
- Assay vs Purity
- Colorimetric vs Fluorometric Assay
- Assay vs Potency
- Continuous Assay vs Stopped Assay
- BA vs BBA
- BA vs BFA
- BSc vs BA
- BCAA vs Amino Acids
- BA vs MA
- Catalase vs Coagulase Test
- Bachelor of Arts (BA) vs Bachelor of Science (BSc)
- Qualitative Analysis vs Quantitative Analysis
- BPA vs BPS
- Boron vs Borax
- NETCA vs DBCA