What is the Difference Between Consequentialism and Utilitarianism?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Consequentialism and utilitarianism are two ethical theories that share many similarities but have distinct differences. Both theories focus on evaluating the consequences of actions to determine their moral value. Here are the key differences between the two:
- Desired Outcome: Consequentialism does not specify a desired outcome, while utilitarianism specifies good as the desired outcome. Utilitarianism, a form of consequentialism, posits that a given course of action is ethical if its consequences result in the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.
- Hedonism: Utilitarianism is often associated with hedonism, which evaluates consequences based on the amount of pleasure or pain they produce. Consequentialism, on the other hand, does not necessarily imply hedonism and can encompass other forms of evaluation, such as focusing on the consequences of following or not following rules.
- Theories: Utilitarianism is a specific consequentialist theory, while consequentialism is a broader term that encompasses various theories, including utilitarianism.
In summary, consequentialism is a broader ethical framework that focuses on evaluating the consequences of actions, while utilitarianism is a specific form of consequentialism that aims to maximize the good (happiness) and minimize the bad (pain) for the greatest number of people.
Comparative Table: Consequentialism vs Utilitarianism
Here is a table summarizing the differences between Consequentialism and Utilitarianism:
Consequentialism | Utilitarianism |
---|---|
A moral theory that focuses on producing the right kinds of overall consequences. | A specific form of consequentialism that prioritizes maximizing overall happiness. |
Consequentialism does not necessarily imply hedonism; there are other forms of consequentialism. | Utilitarianism is often characterized as consequentialism plus hedonism. |
Rule consequentialism is one type of consequentialism that focuses on rules rather than purely the consequences of actions. | Utilitarianism is a species (specific type) within the genus (broader category) of consequentialism. |
In summary, utilitarianism is a specific form of consequentialism that prioritizes maximizing overall happiness, while consequentialism is a broader category of moral theories focused on producing the right kinds of overall consequences.
- Kantianism vs Utilitarianism
- Utilitarianism vs Deontology
- Act Utilitarianism vs Rule Utilitarianism
- Teleological vs Deontological
- Determinism vs Fatalism
- Functionalism vs Behaviorism
- Ethics vs Morality
- Functionalism vs Conflict Theory
- Metaethics vs Normative Ethics
- Cultural Relativism vs Moral Relativism
- Cause vs Effect
- Ethics vs Morals
- Pragmatism vs Progressivism
- Egoism vs Altruism
- Pragmatism vs Idealism
- Functionalism vs Neofunctionalism
- Ethical vs Moral
- Positivism vs Logical Positivism
- Natural Law vs Legal Positivism