What is the Difference Between Cyclobutane and Cyclopropane?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Cyclobutane and cyclopropane are both cyclic hydrocarbons with ring structures, but they differ in the number of carbon atoms in their rings and the type of strain they exhibit. Here are the main differences between the two:
- Number of carbon atoms: Cyclobutane has four carbon atoms in its ring structure, while cyclopropane has three carbon atoms in its ring structure.
- Ring strain: Both cyclobutane and cyclopropane experience ring strain due to the reduced bond angles in their ring structures. However, the ring strain in cyclopropane is much higher than that of cyclobutane due to the lower bond angles. The total strain for cyclopentane is 26 kJ/mol (6.2 kcal/mol), which is nearly strain-free compared to cyclobutane (110 kJ/mol or 26.4 kcal/mol) and cyclopropane (115 kJ/mol or 27.5 kcal/mol).
- Torsional strain: Cyclopropane has a considerable torsional strain due to the eclipsed conformation of the hydrogen atoms, while cyclobutane has less torsional strain. Cyclopentane has an immense amount of torsional strain, but it adopts non-planar conformations to reduce it.
- Bond strength: The C-C bond strength in cyclopropane is considerably weaker (65 kcal/mol) than the typical alkane bond strength. In cyclobutane, the bond angles are 88° rather than the 109.5° found in typical alkanes, resulting in less angle strain than in cyclopropane but still significant strain.
In summary, cyclobutane and cyclopropane are both cyclic hydrocarbons with ring structures, but they differ in the number of carbon atoms, the type and amount of strain they exhibit, and their bond strengths.
Comparative Table: Cyclobutane vs Cyclopropane
Cyclobutane and cyclopropane are both cyclic hydrocarbons with different ring structures. Here is a table comparing their differences:
Property | Cyclopropane | Cyclobutane |
---|---|---|
Number of Carbon Atoms | 3 | 4 |
Number of H-H Eclipsing Interactions | 3 | 4 |
Ring Strain (kcal/mole) | Approximately 28 | Approximately 26 |
Angle Strain | Significant, with 60º bond angles | Significant, with 88º bond angles |
Torsional Strain | High | Present, but less than in cyclopropane |
Conformation | Planar (flat) with carbon atoms at the corners of an equilateral triangle | Puckered, with bond angles of 88º rather than 109.5º |
Cyclopropane and cyclobutane both have ring strain due to angle strain and torsional strain. Cyclopropane has more angle strain than cyclobutane, as its bond angles are closer to 60º than 109.5º, while cyclobutane has a lesser degree of angle strain with bond angles of 88º. Cyclobutane also has torsional strain, but the neighboring C-H bonds are not exactly eclipsed in its puckered conformation. Both cyclopropane and cyclobutane have high heats of combustion per CH2 unit, indicating that they are less stable than cyclohexane.
- Cyclopropane Propane vs Propene
- N-butane vs Cyclobutane
- Cyclopentane vs Cyclopentene
- Cyclohexane vs Cyclohexene
- Acetylene vs Propane
- Propane vs Butane
- Benzene vs Cyclohexane
- Hexane vs Cyclohexane
- Chlorobenzene vs Chlorocyclohexane
- Cis vs Trans Cyclohexane
- Butane vs Isobutane
- Methane vs Propane
- Chlorobenzene vs Cyclohexyl Chloride
- Butane vs Butene
- Chloroethane vs Chlorobenzene
- Propane vs Natural Gas
- Homocyclic vs Heterocyclic Compounds
- Acyclic vs Cyclic Organic Compounds
- Carbocyclic vs Heterocyclic