What is the Difference Between Direct Write Off Method and Allowance Method?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The direct write-off method and the allowance method are two different approaches used to account for uncollectible accounts or bad debts in accounting. The main differences between the two methods are related to timing and adherence to the matching principle.
Direct Write-off Method:
- In this method, an account receivable is written off directly as an expense when it is deemed uncollectible.
- Bad debt expense is recognized only when a specific account is identified as being uncollectible.
- This method is simpler and more straightforward, as it involves only one entry when a specific invoice is identified as a bad debt.
- The direct write-off method is commonly used by smaller businesses and for tax purposes.
Allowance Method:
- In the allowance method, an estimate of the future amount of bad debt is charged to a reserve account as soon as a sale is made.
- This method adheres to the matching principle, as the expense is paired with the sale, so that all expenses related to the sale are reported in the same period as the sale.
- The allowance method requires an estimate of bad debts, rather than the specific identification of bad debts, which can be less accurate than the direct write-off method.
- If actual bad debts differ from the estimate, the allowance account is adjusted accordingly in the subsequent period.
In summary, the direct write-off method recognizes bad debt expense only when a specific account is identified as uncollectible, while the allowance method estimates and records bad debt expense in advance, adhering to the matching principle. The direct write-off method is simpler and more commonly used by smaller businesses and for tax purposes, while the allowance method is more commonly used by larger businesses and adheres to generally accepted accounting principles.
Comparative Table: Direct Write Off Method vs Allowance Method
The Direct Write-Off Method and Allowance Method are two different approaches to account for uncollectible accounts in the context of receivables. Here is a table highlighting the key differences between the two methods:
Method | Estimation of Uncollectible Accounts | Timing of Expense Recognition | GAAP Compliance | Example Journal Entry |
---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Write-Off | Only when a customer will not pay | When an account is deemed uncollectible | Not in accordance with GAAP | Debit: Bad Debt Expense, Credit: Accounts Receivable |
Allowance | In advance, based on an estimate | At the end of each accounting period | In accordance with GAAP | Debit: Bad Debt Expense, Credit: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
The Direct Write-Off Method recognizes bad accounts as an expense when they are judged to be uncollectible. It does not involve the use of the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts or any estimates. This method violates the GAAP matching principle, as revenues and expenses are not recorded in the same accounting period.
On the other hand, the Allowance Method provides in advance for uncollectible accounts, setting aside money in a reserve account. This method is in accordance with GAAP accounting principles. When a customer's account is deemed uncollectible under this method, the estimated amount calculated using sales or accounts receivable is used to offset the loss instead of the Bad Debt Expense.
- Accounting Depreciation vs Tax Depreciation
- Depreciation vs Provision for Depreciation
- Tax Offset vs Tax Deduction
- Direct vs Indirect Costs
- Tolerance vs Allowance
- Discount Allowed vs Discount Received
- Direct vs Indirect Cash Flow
- Exemption vs Deduction
- SLM vs WDV Method of Depreciation
- Allow vs Permit
- Direct Tax vs Indirect Tax
- Depreciation vs Amortization
- Proportionate Consolidation vs Equity Method
- Depreciation vs Accumulated Depreciation
- Devaluation vs Depreciation
- Amortization vs Impairment
- Approach vs Method
- Depreciation vs Depletion
- Let vs Allow