What is the Difference Between FIR Filter and IRR Filter?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between FIR (Finite Impulse Response) and IIR (Infinite Impulse Response) filters lies in the duration of their impulse responses and the use of feedback. Here are the key differences between FIR and IIR filters:
- Impulse Response: FIR filters have a finite impulse response, meaning their output decays to zero after a certain period of time. In contrast, IIR filters have an infinite impulse response, which means their output does not decay to zero and continues indefinitely.
- Feedback: FIR filters do not use feedback circuitry, while IIR filters make use of a feedback loop to provide a portion of the previous output in conjunction with the current input.
- Linear Phase: FIR filters can be easily designed to have a linear phase, which means that no phase distortion is introduced into the signal to be filtered. All frequencies are shifted in time by the same amount, maintaining their relative harmonic phase. IIR filters, on the other hand, have a non-linear phase characteristic.
- Stability: FIR filters are generally more stable than IIR filters because they do not use feedback, which can cause instability.
- Implementation Cost: IIR filters usually have a lower implementation cost compared to FIR filters.
- Computational Efficiency: FIR filters generally require more processing power than IIR filters, making IIR filters more computationally efficient.
In summary, FIR filters are characterized by their finite impulse response, lack of feedback, and linear phase, making them suitable for a wide range of applications. IIR filters, on the other hand, have an infinite impulse response and use feedback, making them more computationally efficient and cost-effective for certain applications. The choice between FIR and IIR filters depends on factors such as stability, linear phase requirements, and computational resources.
Comparative Table: FIR Filter vs IRR Filter
Here is a table comparing the differences between FIR (Finite Impulse Response) filters and IIR (Infinite Impulse Response) filters:
Feature | FIR Filter | IIR Filter |
---|---|---|
Definition | FIR filters generate an output using the samples of present and past input values. | IIR filters use present and past input values along with the past output value to generate the output. |
Feedback | FIR filters do not use feedback circuitry. | IIR filters make use of a feedback loop to provide the previous output in conjunction with the present and past input values. |
Linear Phase | FIR filters support linear phase filtering. | IIR filters do not support linear phase filtering. |
Efficiency | FIR filters are generally more efficient in terms of memory and computational requirements. | IIR filters typically require less memory and computational resources. |
Performance | FIR filters are generally easier to design but may need more memory to match the performance of an IIR filter. | IIR filters can provide higher quality results but may be more challenging to design. |
Real-time | FIR filters are suitable for real-time applications where minimal latency is required, such as audio processing. | IIR filters may have a higher latency due to their recursive nature. |
Applications | FIR filters are widely deployed in audio and biomedical signal enhancement applications. | IIR filters are often used in audio and communication systems. |
- FIR vs IIR
- IRR vs ROI
- Active Filter vs Passive Filter
- Excitation vs Emission Filter
- IRR vs NPV
- WACC vs IRR
- Filtration vs Purification
- Clarification vs Filtration
- Filtration vs Reabsorption
- Polarizer vs UV Filter
- Radiation vs Irradiation
- Filtration vs Reverse Osmosis
- Filter Photometer vs Spectrophotometer
- Red Light vs Infrared
- IR vs Raman Spectra
- IR LED vs Photodiode
- Circular Polarizer vs Linear Polarizer
- IAS vs IFRS
- Decantation vs Filtration