What is the Difference Between Flame Atomization and Electrothermal Atomization?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Flame atomization and electrothermal atomization are two different techniques used in atomic absorption spectroscopy for converting a sample into its gaseous atoms that can absorb radiation. The main differences between these two techniques are:
- Sensitivity: Electrothermal atomization has a higher sensitivity compared to flame atomization, which means it requires less analyte to achieve a given absorbance.
- Sample vaporization: In electrothermal atomization, the entire sample is vaporized, whereas in flame atomization, only a small fraction of the sample enters the flame.
- Atom concentration: In electrothermal atomization, the atom cloud is released into a relatively small volume of gas, resulting in higher concentrations of atoms. In contrast, in flame atomization, the atom cloud is diluted by the high flow rate of gases and by the expansion of gases during combustion.
- Molecular recombination: In electrothermal atomization, molecular recombination of atoms is retarded by the atmosphere of inert gas, which restricts oxidation. In contrast, in flame atomization, oxidation occurs very rapidly.
- Analyte concentration: The choice between flame and electrothermal atomization depends on the analyte's concentration in the sample. Flame atomization is the method of choice for samples with higher concentrations (1–10 mg/L), while electrothermal atomization is best for samples with lower concentrations (1–10 μg/L).
In summary, electrothermal atomization is generally more sensitive and suitable for samples with lower analyte concentrations, while flame atomization is more suitable for samples with higher analyte concentrations.
On this pageWhat is the Difference Between Flame Atomization and Electrothermal Atomization? Comparative Table: Flame Atomization vs Electrothermal Atomization
Comparative Table: Flame Atomization vs Electrothermal Atomization
Flame atomization and electrothermal atomization are two techniques used for sample atomization in atomic absorption spectroscopy. Here are the main differences between the two methods:
Feature | Flame Atomization | Electrothermal Atomization |
---|---|---|
Sample Introduction | Sample is introduced into a flame through a nebulizer. | Sample is introduced directly (usually as a solution) into a heated graphite tube. |
Atomization Process | Atomization occurs in the flame, where a mixture of oxidants and fuels is used to achieve a specific temperature range. | Atomization occurs in three stages: drying, charring, and incandescence. A high current heats the graphite tube to an inert atmosphere, atomizing the element being determined. |
Sensitivity | Lower sensitivity compared to electrothermal atomization. More sample is needed to achieve a given absorbance. | Higher sensitivity compared to flame atomization. Less sample is needed to achieve a given absorbance. |
Analyte Concentration | Suitable for samples containing 1–10 mg/L of the analyte. | Suitable for samples containing 1–10 μg/L of the analyte. |
Read more:
- Ionization vs Electrolysis
- Molten vs Aqueous Electrolysis
- Flame Emission Spectroscopy vs Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
- Electroplating vs Electrolysis
- Enthalpy of Atomisation vs Bond Dissociation
- Electrolyte vs Electrolysis
- Electrophoretic Deposition vs Electrodeposition
- Steam Reforming vs Autothermal Reforming
- Electrolysis vs Laser
- Electrocoagulation vs Chemical Coagulation
- Fusion vs Vaporization
- Electroforming vs Electroplating
- Electrochemical Cell vs Electrolytic Cell
- Metallic vs Electrolytic Conduction
- Atomic Absorption vs Atomic Emission
- Electrophoresis vs Electroosmosis
- Sol-Gel vs Hydrothermal Method
- Electrical vs Thermal Conductivity
- Combustion vs Pyrolysis