What is the Difference Between GATT and GATS?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) are both multilateral trade agreements aimed at expanding market access and reducing trade barriers. However, they differ in their approach and scope:
- Scope: GATT primarily focuses on international trade in goods (merchandise), while GATS covers international trade in services.
- Integration: GATT was designed with "shallow integration" in mind, achieving market access expansion primarily through negotiated reductions in tariffs. In contrast, GATS reflects an orientation towards "deep integration," whereby the negotiated change or removal of non-tariff barriers plays a more significant role.
- Modes of Supply: GATS distinguishes between four modes of supplying services: cross-border trade, consumption abroad, commercial presence, and presence of natural persons. GATT, on the other hand, does not have such distinctions.
- National Policy Objectives: Both GATT and GATS expressly recognize the right of members to regulate the supply of services and pursue national policy objectives. However, GATS allows for more protectionist measures compared to GATT.
In summary, GATT and GATS differ in their focus on trade in goods versus trade in services, their approach to integration, the modes of supply they cover, and the extent of protectionist measures they allow.
Comparative Table: GATT vs GATS
The main differences between the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) are related to the types of trade they govern and the level of protection they provide. Here is a table summarizing these differences:
Feature | GATT | GATS |
---|---|---|
Governance | Applies to international trade in goods | Applies to international trade in services |
Protection | Provides protection for goods | Provides protection for services |
Liberalization | Aims to achieve a progressively higher level of liberalization through successive rounds of negotiations | Aims to achieve a progressively higher level of liberalization through successive rounds of negotiations |
Market Access | Tariffs are the main instrument for managing market access in GATT | Commitments in a member's schedule and the Article XVI market access column determine the level of market access restrictions |
Domestic Regulation | National treatment obligations under GATT apply to all products, without exceptions | National treatment obligations under GATS are triggered only for committed services sectors and are subject to explicit exceptions |
Both GATT and GATS share the same goal of liberalizing trade, but they differ in the types of trade they cover and the specific provisions they include. For example, GATT primarily uses tariffs as the main instrument for managing market access, while GATS relies on commitments in a member's schedule and the Article XVI market access column. Additionally, GATS allows for more protectionist measures compared to GATT, particularly in the area of domestic regulation.
- GATT vs WTO
- UN vs WTO
- IMF vs WTO
- GDP vs GNP
- CAT vs GMAT
- G20 vs G8
- Tariff Barriers vs Non Tariff Barriers
- Free Trade vs Free Market
- Tariff vs Quota
- ATP vs GTP
- Bilateral vs Multilateral Trade Agreements
- NAFTA vs EU
- CECA vs FTA
- Free Trade vs Protectionism
- Fair Trade vs Free Trade
- GMP vs CGMP
- Globalization vs Internationalization
- Duty vs Tariff
- GAP vs GEF