What is the Difference Between Heterotopic Ossification and Myositis Ossificans?

Heterotopic ossification (HO) and myositis ossificans are related but distinct conditions involving the formation of bone in soft tissues where it normally does not exist. The main differences between the two are:

Definition: HO is the formation of mature lamellar bone in nonosseous tissue, while myositis ossificans is a specific type of HO that occurs in inflammatory muscle. Myositis ossificans is the most common form of HO, usually occurring within large muscles.
Pathophysiology: Both conditions involve ectopic ossification, but they are distinct from periarticular calcification, which is the deposition of pyrophosphates within the soft tissues surrounding the joints. Myositis ossificans is essentially the metaplasia of intramuscular connective tissue, resulting in bone formation.
Causes: Myositis ossificans typically occurs after trauma to the muscle or a broken bone, with new bone cells forming between the torn muscle fibers. This condition most commonly affects young adults and children, and it often occurs around the elbow or thigh. On the other hand, HO can be caused by various factors, including surgery, trauma, and other local or systemic insults.
Histopathology: The histopathologic appearance of HO evolves over time, with early lesions often being hypercellular and having little bone matrix, which can prompt concern for a soft-tissue sarcoma. Later lesions have prominent bone formation with a characteristic zonal architecture. Myositis ossificans can have a similar histopathologic appearance, but it is specifically related to muscle tissue.

In summary, heterotopic ossification is a broader term encompassing the formation of bone in soft tissues, while myositis ossificans is a specific type of HO that occurs in muscle tissue. Both conditions involve ectopic ossification and can be caused by trauma, among other factors.

On this page

What is the Difference Between Heterotopic Ossification and Myositis Ossificans?

Comparative Table: Heterotopic Ossification vs Myositis Ossificans

Heterotopic ossification (HO) and myositis ossificans are both conditions related to the formation of bone in atypical, extraskeletal tissues. However, they have some differences in their causes and manifestations. Here is a table summarizing the differences between the two:

Feature	Heterotopic Ossification (HO)	Myositis Ossificans (MO)
Definition	Formation of extraskeletal bone in muscle and soft tissues.	The most common form of HO, usually occurring within large muscles.
Causes	Can be both genetic and acquired, with acquired being the most common, closely related to tissue trauma, such as joint surgery, musculoskeletal trauma, central nervous system injury.	Occurs after trauma to the muscle or a broken bone, with new bone cells forming between the torn muscle fibers.
Histopathology	Early lesions are often hypercellular with little bone matrix, while later lesions have prominent bone formation with a characteristic zonal architecture.	Essentially a metaplasia of the intramuscular connective tissue, resulting in.
Location	Can occur in various soft tissues..	Typically occurs around the elbow or thigh, affecting children and young adults most often.
Diagnosis	A thorough subjective and objective examination, along with radiographic imaging, is necessary for diagnosis.	The histological appearance of myositis ossificans can appear similar to osteosarcoma, which can lead to inappropriate management.

In summary, while both HO and myositis ossificans involve the formation of bone in extraskeletal tissues, HO can have both genetic and acquired causes and can occur in various soft tissues, while myositis ossificans is the most common form of HO and typically occurs within large muscles following muscle or bone trauma.

Guilherme Mazui

Guilherme Mazui is graduated in journalism from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and a master's degree in Communication from the University of São Paulo (USP). In addition, he has experience in advertising writing and has worked as a content editor in several companies.