What is the Difference Between Hexagonal Close Packing and Cubic Close Packing?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between hexagonal close packing (HCP) and cubic close packing (CCP) lies in the arrangement of atoms in their respective unit cells. Both HCP and CCP are efficient ways to pack atoms in a lattice structure, but they have distinct features:
- Hexagonal Close Packing (HCP):
- Contains two layers of spheres placed one on the other, forming tetrahedral and octahedral holes.
- Has a coordination number of 12 and contains 6 atoms per unit cell.
- The hexagonal unit cell has one large octahedral hole per sphere surrounded by six smaller octahedral holes and two tetrahedral holes for each sphere.
- The third layer is placed in such a way that the atoms in the third layer lie directly above the atoms in the first layer.
- Cubic Close Packing (CCP):
- Contains three layers of spheres placed one on the other, covering all the octahedral holes by a third layer of spheres.
- Has a coordination number of 12 and contains 4 atoms per unit cell.
- The cubic unit cell has tetrahedral holes but no octahedral holes.
- The third layer is placed in a way that the atoms in the third layer are not in line with those in the first layer, and the structure does not repeat until a fourth layer is added.
In summary, the main difference between HCP and CCP is the arrangement of atoms in the third layer and the presence of octahedral holes in HCP, while CCP has no octahedral holes in its unit cell and a different stacking pattern in the second and third layers.
Comparative Table: Hexagonal Close Packing vs Cubic Close Packing
The main differences between hexagonal close packing (hcp) and cubic close packing (ccp) are the arrangement of atoms in the layers and the coordination number. Here is a table comparing the two structures:
Property | Hexagonal Close Packing (hcp) | Cubic Close Packing (ccp) |
---|---|---|
Layers | Atoms are placed in layers, with the third layer placed in the depressions of the first layer, creating a hexagonal arrangement. | Atoms are placed in layers, with the second layer on top of half of the depressions of the first layer, and the third layer placed in the octahedral holes created by the first and second layers. |
Coordination Number | 12 | 12 |
Atoms Per Unit Cell | 6 | 4 |
Space Efficiency | 74% | 74% |
Both hexagonal and cubic close packing structures have a coordination number of 12 and efficiently fill up 74% of space. However, the arrangement of atoms in the layers and the number of atoms per unit cell differ between the two structures.
- Primitive Hexagonal Unit Cell vs Hexagonal Closed Packing
- Hexagon vs Monoclinic Unit Cell
- Packing vs Packaging
- Hexane vs Cyclohexane
- Tetrahedral vs Octahedral Voids
- Hermetic vs Non-hermetic Packaging
- Cyclohexane vs Cyclohexene
- Dioctahedral vs Trioctahedral
- Square Planar vs Tetrahedral Complexes
- Cubic Zirconia vs Diamond
- Triangular Prism vs Triangular Pyramid (Tetrahedron)
- Heptane vs Hexane
- Open Tubular vs Packed Columns
- Hexane vs n-Hexane
- Cubicin vs Cubicin RF
- Lattice vs Unit Cell
- Cis vs Trans Cyclohexane
- Lattice vs Crystal
- Crystals vs Quasicrystals