What is the Difference Between In Vitro and In Vivo?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The terms "in vitro" and "in vivo" describe different types of scientific research and experimental methods used in medical and biological studies. Here are the key differences between the two:
- In vitro is Latin for "in glass" and refers to studies performed outside of a living organism, such as in a laboratory dish or test tube. This methodology allows scientists to evaluate various biological phenomena in specific cells and perform more detailed analyses. However, in vitro studies cannot replicate the conditions that occur inside a living organism, which may limit the applicability of the results.
- In vivo is Latin for "within the living" and refers to tests, experiments, and procedures conducted in or on a whole living organism, such as a person, laboratory animal, or plant. In vivo studies provide a more accurate representation of the conditions inside a living organism but may be more complex, time-consuming, and expensive compared to in vitro studies.
Both in vitro and in vivo studies are essential for understanding the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of a drug. They are often used in combination during the drug development process, with in vitro models providing initial insights into a cell's response, followed by in vivo studies to evaluate the drug's safety, efficacy, and delivery in living organisms.
Comparative Table: In Vitro vs In Vivo
Here is a table highlighting the differences between in vitro and in vivo studies:
Feature | In Vitro | In Vivo |
---|---|---|
Latin Translation | Within the glass (test tube, petri dish, etc.) | Within the living (organism, animal, human) |
Environment | Controlled laboratory setting | Inside a living organism, more complex conditions |
Control | Easier to manipulate and analyze specific aspects of biological systems | Limited control over variables, interactions, and compensations |
Examples | Pharmaceutical testing, cellular and molecular studies | Disease pathology, animal models, clinical trials |
Advantages | Higher precision, controlled conditions, isolation of specific components | Better suited for observing overall effects, interactions, and long-term observations |
Limitations | Results may not necessarily predict reactions in living organisms | Complexity, ethical considerations, potential for misleading conclusions |
In vitro studies are conducted outside of living organisms, typically using isolated cells, tissues, or biological molecules in controlled laboratory settings. These experiments allow researchers to manipulate and analyze specific aspects of biological systems with precision. On the other hand, in vivo studies involve living organisms, such as animals or humans, and provide a comprehensive view of biological processes within the intact organism. While in vitro studies offer controlled conditions and higher precision, in vivo studies are better suited for observing overall effects, interactions, and long-term observations. Both in vitro and in vivo studies are not mutually exclusive but rather complementary, each contributing unique insights to the understanding of complex biological phenomena.
- Ex Vivo vs In Vivo Gene Therapy
- Artificial Insemination vs In Vitro Fertilization
- IVM vs IVF
- IVF vs IUI
- Viviparous vs Oviparous
- IVF vs ICSI
- Germination vs Vivipary
- Inoculation vs Vaccination
- Vertebrates vs Invertebrates
- Inoculation vs Incubation
- Organic Chemistry vs Inorganic Chemistry
- In Situ Hybridization vs Immunohistochemistry
- Oviparity Ovoviviparity vs Viviparity
- Live Attenuated vs Inactivated Vaccines
- Live vs Alive
- Alive vs Living
- IVF vs Surrogacy
- Outpatient vs Inpatient
- Anatomy vs Physiology