What is the Difference Between Link State and Distance Vector?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between link-state and distance-vector routing protocols lies in the way they gather and share information about the network topology. Here are the key differences between the two:
- Information Gathering: Distance-vector protocols only need to know the state of their neighbors and the metrics for each path to a particular subnet. In contrast, link-state protocols require a complete picture of the network topology, as each router shares information about its directly connected links with all other routers in the network.
- Data Sharing: Distance-vector protocols send their entire routing table to directly connected neighbors. On the other hand, link-state protocols flood the entire network with information about their directly connected links.
- Algorithms: Distance-vector protocols make use of the Bellman-Ford Algorithm for making routing tables, while link-state protocols use Dijkstra's algorithm.
- Bandwidth Requirements: Distance-vector routing requires less bandwidth due to local sharing, small packets, and no flooding. In contrast, link-state routing requires more bandwidth due to flooding and sending large link-state packets.
- Router Utilization: Link-state protocols have higher router utilization as they need to keep information about the entire network. Distance-vector protocols have lower router utilization as they only need to know about their directly connected neighbors.
- Network Convergence: Link-state protocols have faster convergence times as they have a complete picture of the network topology. Distance-vector protocols have slower convergence times as they rely on the exchange of information between neighbors.
- Best Path Accuracy: Link-state protocols can deterministically compute the shortest path to any given destination using the Dijkstra algorithm. Distance-vector protocols base their decisions on the best path to a given destination based on local knowledge, which may not always result in the optimal path.
In conclusion, the choice between link-state and distance-vector routing protocols depends on the specific requirements of a network, such as network size, topology, and desired performance characteristics.
Comparative Table: Link State vs Distance Vector
Link State and Distance Vector are two different approaches to dynamic routing algorithms in computer networks. Here is a comparison table highlighting the key differences between them:
Feature | Link State Routing | Distance Vector Routing |
---|---|---|
Bandwidth requirement | More due to flooding and sending large link state packets | Less due to local sharing, small packets, and no flooding |
Knowledge base | Global knowledge about the entire network | Local knowledge based on information from neighbors |
Algorithm | Dijkstra's algorithm | Bellman-Ford algorithm |
Update frequency | Information sharing takes place only when there is a change | Information is shared with neighbors at regular intervals |
Examples | OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) and IS-IS (Intermediate System to Intermediate System) | RIP (Routing Information Protocol) and IGRP (Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) |
In summary, Link State Routing protocols have a broader perspective of the network, using a global view of the routers, while Distance Vector protocols work with the state of the neighbors' routers, using a more local view of the network.
- EIGRP vs OSPF
- Carrier vs Vector
- Distance vs Displacement
- Vectors vs Scalars
- Genetic Linkage vs Linkage Disequilibrium
- Static vs Dynamic Routing
- Genetic Distance vs Physical Distance
- Bridge vs Router
- Router vs Switch
- RIP vs OSPF
- VLAN vs Subnet
- Genetic Map vs Linkage Map
- Layer 2 vs Layer 3 Switches
- MPLS vs VPLS
- Bitmap vs Vector
- Static VLAN vs Dynamic VLAN
- Insertion vs Replacement Vectors
- Raster vs Vector Graphics
- Centralized Routing vs Distributed Routing