What is the Difference Between Memcached and Redis?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚Memcached and Redis are both popular, open-source, in-memory data stores, but they have some key differences:
- Primary use case: Memcached is a cache-focused key/value store, while Redis is often used for caching as well, but it can also be utilized as a primary database or a message broker.
- Data structures: Redis offers a rich set of features and a wide range of use cases, including advanced data structures, transactions, and Pub/Sub (publish/subscribe) features. Memcached, on the other hand, is designed for simplicity and does not support these advanced features.
- Multithreading: Redis has a multithreaded architecture, while Memcached does not.
- Geospatial support: Redis has geospatial support, which Memcached lacks.
- Latency: Memcached has a more predictable and easy-to-reason-about latency profile due to its simpler data structures. Redis's latency can vary widely across operations because of its more complex data structures and time complexity.
In summary, Memcached is a simpler, cache-focused key/value store, while Redis offers a broader range of features and use cases, including advanced data structures and support for geospatial data. Memcached has a more predictable latency profile, but Redis provides a multithreaded architecture for better performance under load.
Comparative Table: Memcached vs Redis
Here is a table comparing the differences between Memcached and Redis:
Feature | Memcached | Redis |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Multi-threaded, ideal for large data | Single-threaded, ideal for small data |
Data Types | Limited to strings | Supports lists, sets, sorted sets, hashes, bit arrays, and hyperloglogs |
Memory Use | Uses multiple processing cores | Uses a single core |
Latency | Sub-millisecond | Sub-millisecond |
Ease of Use | Easy to install and use | Easy to install and use |
Scalability | Vertical scalability | Vertical and horizontal scalability |
Transactions | No transactions support | Transactions support |
Pub/Sub | No publish/subscribe support | Publish/subscribe support |
Scripting | No built-in scripting support | Built-in Lua scripting support |
Geospatial | No geospatial support | Geospatial support |
Memcached is designed for simplicity and is ideal for large quantities of data, while Redis offers a rich set of features and is suitable for a wide range of use cases. Memcached has a multi-threaded architecture, making it more efficient for handling large amounts of data, whereas Redis has a single-threaded architecture, making it more suitable for smaller quantities of data. Redis also supports advanced data structures, transactions, and has built-in scripting and geospatial support, which are not available in Memcached.
- RAM vs Cache Memory
- Cache Memory vs Virtual Memory
- Cache vs Cookies
- CPU vs RAM
- Buffering vs Caching
- Hard Disk vs RAM
- Static RAM vs Dynamic RAM
- NoSQL vs MongoDB
- Memory vs Hard Disk
- Memory vs Storage
- RDBMS vs Hadoop
- Firebase vs MongoDB
- RAM vs Processor
- Hashtable vs Hashmap
- Dictionary vs Hashtable
- Physical vs Virtual Memory
- L1 vs L2 Cache
- RPC vs RMI
- Working Memory vs Short Term Memory