What is the Difference Between Scientific laws and Scientific Theories?

The main difference between scientific laws and scientific theories lies in their purpose and the level of certainty they provide. Here is a comparison of the two:

Scientific Laws:

Scientific laws are statements that summarize the relationship between variables and describe what happens under certain conditions.
They are typically well-supported by observations and/or experimental evidence.
Laws are frequently written as equations.
They predict the results of certain initial conditions.

Scientific Theories:

Scientific theories are overarching explanations of how nature works and why it exhibits certain behaviors.
Theories try to provide the most logical explanation about why things happen as they do.
They are based on observations and can be verified through experiments or more observations.
Theories explain why we observe what we do.

In summary, scientific laws describe and predict the results of certain initial conditions, while scientific theories propose explanations for why things happen as they do. Both laws and theories are essential for understanding the natural world, and they often work together to provide a comprehensive understanding of various phenomena.

On this page

What is the Difference Between Scientific laws and Scientific Theories?

Comparative Table: Scientific laws vs Scientific Theories

Here is a table comparing the difference between scientific laws and scientific theories:

Feature	Scientific Laws	Scientific Theories
Definition	Laws describe the relationships between variables and are usually written as equations or mathematical formulas.	Theories are overarching explanations of how nature works and why it exhibits certain behaviors.
Purpose	Laws predict the results of certain initial conditions and can be used to make predictions.	Theories explain why we observe what we do and provide logical explanations about why things happen as they do.
Nature of Idea	Laws are concise, simple, and are typically well-supported by observations and experiments.	Theories are more complex and can evolve, be revised, or replaced over time as more evidence is gathered.
Relationship with Evidence	Laws are based on patterns observed in large amounts of data and are usually difficult to change with new or better evidence.	Theories are based on multiple observations or pieces of evidence, and they can change when a theory cannot explain these observations or evidence.
Examples	Newton's Laws of Motion, which describe the motion of objects under specific conditions.	Theories of evolution by natural selection or the Big Bang Theory, which explain the origins and development of life or the universe.

Please note that scientific theories do not become scientific laws with the accumulation of new or better evidence. They are separate constructs, with laws focusing on predicting behaviors and theories focusing on explaining why those behaviors occur.

Guilherme Mazui

Guilherme Mazui is graduated in journalism from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and a master's degree in Communication from the University of São Paulo (USP). In addition, he has experience in advertising writing and has worked as a content editor in several companies.