What is the Difference Between Trivalent and Hexavalent Zinc Plating?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between trivalent and hexavalent zinc plating lies in their environmental impact, toxicity, and process efficiency. Here are the key differences:
- Environmental Impact: Trivalent zinc plating is considered more environmentally friendly than hexavalent zinc plating. Trivalent chromium processes are less toxic, and hexavalent chromium plating produces several byproducts that are considered hazardous.
- Toxicity: Trivalent chromium plating is more safely regulated than hexavalent chromium plating, reducing hazardous waste and other compliance costs.
- Process Efficiency: Trivalent zinc plating has a higher efficiency with more uniform distribution compared to hexavalent zinc plating. It is also possible to barrel plate with trivalent chromium, which is not possible with hexavalent chromium.
- Cost: Hexavalent zinc plating is generally less expensive than trivalent zinc plating, but the latter offers more advantages in terms of environmental impact and process efficiency.
- Performance: Corrosion test numbers are significantly better for trivalent passivates over zinc than hexavalent chromium over zinc. Trivalent chromium plating is more versatile, and its plating distribution is more uniform.
In summary, trivalent zinc plating is a more environmentally friendly, less toxic, and more efficient process compared to hexavalent zinc plating. However, hexavalent zinc plating is less expensive. The choice between the two processes depends on factors such as environmental considerations, performance requirements, and cost constraints.
Comparative Table: Trivalent vs Hexavalent Zinc Plating
The key difference between trivalent and hexavalent zinc plating lies in their efficiency, environmental impact, and safety. Here is a comparison table outlining the differences between the two processes:
Property | Trivalent Zinc Plating | Hexavalent Zinc Plating |
---|---|---|
Efficiency | Higher efficiency | Lower efficiency |
Environmental Impact | Environmentally friendly | Harmful to the environment |
Safety | Relatively safe | Very unsafe |
Waste Treatment | Easy | Expensive |
Throwing Power | Good | Poor |
Tolerance to Contamination | Fairly good | Not as good |
Barrel Plating | Possible | Not possible |
Color Variation | Standard colors, yellow not created with hexavalent solution | Yellow created with hexavalent solution |
Trivalent zinc plating is a more modern process that offers higher efficiency, better uniformity, and is more environmentally friendly than hexavalent zinc plating. It is also safer to use and has a good throwing power, which allows for better coverage on complex shapes. Additionally, trivalent zinc plating can be used in barrel plating, making it more cost-effective for larger volumes of smaller parts. However, hexavalent zinc plating is less expensive and has some advantages in terms of throwing power and contamination tolerance.
- Zinc vs Nickel Plating
- Acid Zinc vs Alkaline Zinc Plating
- Chromium vs Hexavalent Chromium
- Zinc vs Zinc Oxide
- Zinc White vs Titanium White
- Galvanized vs Hot Dip Galvanized
- Zinc vs Iron
- Zintec vs Galvanised
- Lead Nitrate vs Zinc Nitrate
- Coating vs Plating
- Zinc Picolinate vs Zinc Chelate
- Electroplating vs Galvanisation
- Zinc Acetate vs Zinc Sulphate
- Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate vs Heptahydrate
- Zinc vs Zinc Picolinate
- Zinc vs Magnesium
- Monovalent vs Divalent
- Zinc Citrate vs Zinc Gluconate
- Zinc Gluconate vs Zinc Sulfate